BALIYA TURI BALI TURI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - R.MUKHOPADHYAY (A.P.P.), ,NEHALA SHARMIN — Cr.A(SJ)/710/2009
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed with modification on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010009432009
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/14707/2009
Filing Date
30-Jul-2009
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/710/2009
Registration Date
30-Jul-2009
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
CONVCITION WITH JAIL-IMPRISONMENT UPTO 3 YEARS. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed with modification
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALIYA TURI BALI TURI
Adv. ASHISH VERMA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA, ,NIKESH KUMAR SINHA,NIKESH KUMAR SINHA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA,NIKESH KUMAR SINHA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA,NIKESH KUMAR SINHA,SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - R.MUKHOPADHYAY (A.P.P.), ,NEHALA SHARMIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
Case Summary: Baliya Turi v. State of Jharkhand Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the appeal on merits, upholding the conviction under Section 325 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt. However, the court modified the sentence by granting the appellant probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, directing his release on a Rs. 5,000 bond with surety for one year instead of the three-year imprisonment imposed by the trial court. Key Reasoning: The court found the conviction justified based on medical evidence of injuries sustained by two victims and credible eyewitness testimony. However, considering the appellant's good character, first offense, and the spontaneous nature of the scuffle arising from a domestic dispute, the court exercised discretion to grant probation rather than impose imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
04-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
26-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
19-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
29-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/710/2009
Case Summary: Baliya Turi v. State of Jharkhand Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the appeal on merits, upholding the conviction under Section 325 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt. However, the court modified the sentence by granting the appellant probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, directing his release on a Rs. 5,000 bond with surety for one year instead of the three-year imprisonment imposed by the trial court. Key Reasoning: The court found the conviction justified based on medical evidence of injuries sustained by two victims and credible eyewitness testimony. However, considering the appellant's good character, first offense, and the spontaneous nature of the scuffle arising from a domestic dispute, the court exercised discretion to grant probation rather than impose imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts