UMACHARAN MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — JHHC10008832026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010008832026

Filing Number

WPC/285/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMACHARAN MAHTO

    Adv. SUSHMITA KUMARI,SHEO PRASAD MAHTO,SHEO PRASAD MAHTO, ,NITESH KUMAR,REEPAK KUMAR SINGH,GAUTAM KUMAR SINGH,SHEO PRASAD MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BOKARO

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, BOKARO

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, RANCHI

  5. 5.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, GOMIA

  6. 6.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand found Umacharan Mahto's writ petition defective and not registered as per court procedure. The court granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the application being deemed never filed and no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand found Umacharan Mahto's writ petition defective and not registered as per court procedure. The court granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the application being deemed never filed and no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case