VAISHNAVI FERRO TECH PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NAMELY SUNIL BANSAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AMIT KUMAR — Cont.(Cvl)/66/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dropped on 10th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010006992026
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/213/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/66/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dropped
Last updated 15-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VAISHNAVI FERRO TECH PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR NAMELY SUNIL BANSAL
Adv. SUMEET GADODIA,ANISH LAL,ANISH LAL, ,NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,PRAKHAR HARIT,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,SANYA KUMARI,NIDHI LALL,ANISH LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AMIT KUMAR
-
2.SHRI ARWA RAJKAMAL, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND
-
3.SMT. AKANSHA RANJAN, DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
-
4.SHAMBHU SHARAN BAITHA, GEN. MANAGER, DIST INDUSTRIES CENTRE, DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES, GOVT OF JHARKHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Vaishnavi Ferro Tech (Pvt.) Ltd. after both the petitioner and State counsel jointly submitted that the earlier writ court's order had been fully complied with. The court, accepting their submission, dropped the contempt proceedings and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/66/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Vaishnavi Ferro Tech (Pvt.) Ltd. after both the petitioner and State counsel jointly submitted that the earlier writ court's order had been fully complied with. The court, accepting their submission, dropped the contempt proceedings and closed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts