AGAHAN SAO @ AGHAN SAO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS DEPARTMENT Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR, ,PRASHANT PALLAV — WPC/4036/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010006972025
Filing Number
WPC/247/2025
Filing Date
08-Jan-2025
Registration No
WPC/4036/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AGAHAN SAO @ AGHAN SAO
Adv. HIMANSHU HARSH, ,SHRESTH GAUTAM,OMPRAKASH,BHANU KUMAR No.1,RAHUL ANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS DEPARTMENT Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR, ,PRASHANT PALLAV
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAG
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, HAZARIBAG
-
4.THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HAZARIBAG
-
5.THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD.
-
6.THE GENERAL MANAGER, N.T.P.C., PAKRI BARWADIH COAL MINING PROJECT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: In WPC/4036/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, petitioner Agahan Sao filed an Interlocutory Application (I.A. No.6561 of 2026) requesting that procedural defects Nos.42, 188, and 189 be ignored. Justice Ananda Sen allowed the application on 15.06.2026, directing that the three identified defects be disregarded for purposes of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
24-Feb-2025
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
08-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/4036/2026
Case Summary: In WPC/4036/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, petitioner Agahan Sao filed an Interlocutory Application (I.A. No.6561 of 2026) requesting that procedural defects Nos.42, 188, and 189 be ignored. Justice Ananda Sen allowed the application on 15.06.2026, directing that the three identified defects be disregarded for purposes of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts