RUBI LOHAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT — B.A./350/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),61(2),BNS,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010003422026
Filing Number
B.A./231/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./350/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUBI LOHAR
Adv. ABHINAY KUMAR, ,PARUL PARASAR,ABHISHEK ADITYA,CHANDAN TIWARI,RISHI RANJAN VATS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Rubi Lohar, who was accused under Sections 103(1), 61(2), and 3(5) of BNS 2023, considering her clean criminal record, prolonged custody since May 2025, and the slow trial progress (only 2 of 10 witnesses examined). She was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to attend all court dates and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./350/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted regular bail to Rubi Lohar, who was accused under Sections 103(1), 61(2), and 3(5) of BNS 2023, considering her clean criminal record, prolonged custody since May 2025, and the slow trial progress (only 2 of 10 witnesses examined). She was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to attend all court dates and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts