TIMU TURI vs THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY, ,SUMAN KUMAR GHOSH,ADITYA BANERJEE,ATANU BANERJEE — B.A./121/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5),BNS,2023,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010002712026
Filing Number
B.A./186/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./121/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIMU TURI
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR,VIJAY KUMAR,VIJAY KUMAR, ,VIJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY, ,SUMAN KUMAR GHOSH,ADITYA BANERJEE,ATANU BANERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Summary of B.A. No. 121 of 2026: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Tima Turi, an accused in a shooting case where the informant's son was shot. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay denied bail because the petitioner had confessed (following a co-accused's confession) and was instrumental in recovering the murder weapon, establishing a material connection to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./121/2026
Summary of B.A. No. 121 of 2026: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Tima Turi, an accused in a shooting case where the informant's son was shot. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay denied bail because the petitioner had confessed (following a co-accused's confession) and was instrumental in recovering the murder weapon, establishing a material connection to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts