WAKIL MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY — B.A./3173/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 341,323,324,307,379,448,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010002142026
Filing Number
B.A./141/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./3173/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WAKIL MAHTO
Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND Advocate - ANURADHA SAHAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Wakil Mahto's bail application in a case involving assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 448, 34) arising from a land dispute. The court found the allegations of rod assault causing grievous injury to be directly supported by the injury report and considered the petitioner's prior criminal antecedent as grounds to deny bail, despite his claim of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3173/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Wakil Mahto's bail application in a case involving assault charges (IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 448, 34) arising from a land dispute. The court found the allegations of rod assault causing grievous injury to be directly supported by the injury report and considered the petitioner's prior criminal antecedent as grounds to deny bail, despite his claim of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts