AMOL YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LAXMI MURMU — Cr.A(SJ)/5/2019
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010002032019
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/100/2019
Filing Date
03-Jan-2019
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/5/2019
Registration Date
03-Jan-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMOL YADAV
Adv. BIRENDRA KR JHA,RANJAN KUMAR SINGH,RANJAN KUMAR SINGH, ,RANJAN KUMAR SINGH
-
2.DHOKHAL YADAV
-
3.FEKU YADAV
-
4.RAMANI YADAV
-
5.ANUPLAL YADAV
-
6.GULABI YADAV
-
7.MOTILAL YADAV
-
8.TUNTUN ALIAS ASHISH YADAV ALIAS MUNNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LAXMI MURMU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appellants' criminal appeal and extended benefits under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, thereby setting aside their sentences. The court considered their first-time offender status, absence of criminal history, good conduct per the Probation Officer's report, and the familial relationship between parties as grounds for this relief, requiring only a six-month bond of good behaviour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
09-Jan-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pramath PatnaikView PDF
-
09-Jan-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pramath PatnaikView PDF
-
09-Jan-2019
Orders(with defect)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pramath Patnaik
-
03-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/5/2019
The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appellants' criminal appeal and extended benefits under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, thereby setting aside their sentences. The court considered their first-time offender status, absence of criminal history, good conduct per the Probation Officer's report, and the familial relationship between parties as grounds for this relief, requiring only a six-month bond of good behaviour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts