BABUDHAN HEMBRAM vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA (A.C) — Cr.Rev./302/2026

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010000572026

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./44/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

Cr.Rev./302/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABUDHAN HEMBRAM

    Adv. PRATHIK,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,RITU RAJ,ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA,SHAMBHU NATH TIWARI,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA (A.C)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Babudhan Hembram's revision petition against bail rejection in a POCSO case involving rape allegations against a 13-year-old victim. The court upheld the lower courts' orders, finding credible evidence including blood stains on the victim's clothing and noting that the petitioner's unsafe home environment (mentally unstable father, mute mother) made his continued detention in a remand home necessary for his welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Babudhan Hembram's revision petition against bail rejection in a POCSO case involving rape allegations against a 13-year-old victim. The court upheld the lower courts' orders, finding credible evidence including blood stains on the victim's clothing and noting that the petitioner's unsafe home environment (mentally unstable father, mute mother) made his continued detention in a remand home necessary for his welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case