KARAN RAI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — B.A./55/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010000342026
Filing Number
B.A./23/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./55/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAN RAI
Adv. SHIVAM UTKARSH SAHAY,AMIT KUMAR DAS,AMIT KUMAR DAS, ,SIDDHARTH JAIN,AMIT KUMAR DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case B.A. 55/2026 Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Karan Rai, accused of illegal firearms possession (Adityapur P.S. Case No. 289/2025), who had been in custody since September 19, 2025. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay considered that Rai had no prior criminal record and ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
20-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./55/2026
Case B.A. 55/2026 Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Karan Rai, accused of illegal firearms possession (Adityapur P.S. Case No. 289/2025), who had been in custody since September 19, 2025. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay considered that Rai had no prior criminal record and ordered his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts