JHUBLI DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA — LPA/60/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 13th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010000322026
Filing Number
LPA/11/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
LPA/60/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JHUBLI DEVI
Adv. RAKHI RANI,AKHILESH PRASAD,AKHILESH PRASAD, ,VISHNUPAD SINGH,AKHILESH PRASAD
-
2.MAHENDRA KUMAR SINGH
-
3.URMILA DEVI
-
4.LUIS KUJUR
-
5.SUKAR PRASAD SINGH
-
6.JUGAL RAM @ YUGAL RAM
-
7.RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH
-
8.KULDEEP RAM
-
9.BHUWANESHWAR VISHWAKARMA @ BHWANESHWAR VISHWKARMA
-
10.NAGENDRA SINGH
-
11.MAHENDRA NATH SINGH
-
12.MOTI CHAND THAKUR
-
13.HARI SHANKAR AWASTHI
-
14.ANIL KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA
-
2.THE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND
-
4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, GARHWA
-
5.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, HUSSAINABAD
-
6.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, GARHWA
-
7.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANUSANDHAN DIVISION, GARHWA
-
8.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADHWAN BANDH DIVISION, NAGAR UNTARI
-
9.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, SAHEBGANJ
-
10.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, KHUNTI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Case Summary The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal and directed the state government to implement a National Lok Adalat award within four weeks, granting 14 former daily-rated employees pensionary benefits counting their service from initial appointment rather than regularization date. The court held that Lok Adalat awards are final and binding like civil court decrees, and the government cannot escape implementation through technical objections; it also imposed 6% annual interest on dues from the award date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/60/2026
Case Summary The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal and directed the state government to implement a National Lok Adalat award within four weeks, granting 14 former daily-rated employees pensionary benefits counting their service from initial appointment rather than regularization date. The court held that Lok Adalat awards are final and binding like civil court decrees, and the government cannot escape implementation through technical objections; it also imposed 6% annual interest on dues from the award date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts