PANKAJ KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P./585/2026

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010840702025

Filing Number

EX.P./71511/2025

Filing Date

31-Dec-2025

Registration No

EX.P./585/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajat Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of elementary education(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy director of elementary education(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after finding that the earlier court's mandate had been complied with—the Director of School Education had decided the petitioner's representation on 13.02.2026, albeit by rejecting it. The court closed the proceedings as nothing further remained to be adjudicated, but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies if aggrieved by the rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./585/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after finding that the earlier court's mandate had been complied with—the Director of School Education had decided the petitioner's representation on 13.02.2026, albeit by rejecting it. The court closed the proceedings as nothing further remained to be adjudicated, but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies if aggrieved by the rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case