KALYAN SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5444/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010829052025

Filing Number

CWP/70509/2025

Filing Date

27-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/5444/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALYAN SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Shalini Thakur,Parveen Kumar Chandel,Parveen Kumar Chandel, ,Parveen Kumar Chandel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Administration)(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/5444/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Kalyan Singh's petition seeking notional promotion as Deputy Ranger from 2001 and Range Forest Officer with consequential benefits and arrears. The court found the petition was grossly hit by delay and laches, noting the petitioner remained silent for over 10 years after his 2010 acquittal in a criminal case and filed the petition eight years after his superannuation in August 2015, despite being promoted in April 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 27-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/5444/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Kalyan Singh's petition seeking notional promotion as Deputy Ranger from 2001 and Range Forest Officer with consequential benefits and arrears. The court found the petition was grossly hit by delay and laches, noting the petitioner remained silent for over 10 years after his 2010 acquittal in a criminal case and filed the petition eight years after his superannuation in August 2015, despite being promoted in April 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case