Labh Singh(Not Applicable) vs STATE BANK OF INDIA KARSOG(Not Applicable) Advocate - Arvind Sharma — CR.R/6/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010828112025

Filing Number

CR.R/12364/2025

Filing Date

27-Dec-2025

Registration No

CR.R/6/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Labh Singh(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Guna Nand Verma,Sheetal Thakur,Sheetal Thakur, ,Sheetal Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA KARSOG(Not Applicable) Advocate - Arvind Sharma

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.R No. 6 of 2026 (Labh Singh v. SBI Karsog) The court ordered release of 30% of the compensation amount to the respondent (SBI Karsog) by remitting it to the respondent's savings bank account within one week. The petitioner (Labh Singh) was given reasonable time to deposit the remaining compensation amount. The case was adjourned to 19.5.2026 for further proceedings, with both parties required to appear in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.R No. 6 of 2026 (Labh Singh v. SBI Karsog) The court ordered release of 30% of the compensation amount to the respondent (SBI Karsog) by remitting it to the respondent's savings bank account within one week. The petitioner (Labh Singh) was given reasonable time to deposit the remaining compensation amount. The case was adjourned to 19.5.2026 for further proceedings, with both parties required to appear in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case