NHAI(Not Applicable) vs RAM KRISHAN through his LR(Not Applicable) — OMPM/18/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED. on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010824672025

Filing Number

OMPM/70105/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

OMPM/18/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NHAI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Shreya Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM KRISHAN through his LR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Narender Singh,Malay Kaushal 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    The court condoned NHAI's delay in filing the appeal against the judgment dated 3.6.2025, accepting that the delay resulted from the inefficiency of their previous law firm (M/s M.V. Kini & Co.) which failed to notify them of the case disposal, rather than intentional non-compliance. Additionally, the court stayed execution of the impugned judgment and arbitral award during appeal pendency, subject to NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with accrued interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. OMPM/18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court condoned NHAI's delay in filing the appeal against the judgment dated 3.6.2025, accepting that the delay resulted from the inefficiency of their previous law firm (M/s M.V. Kini & Co.) which failed to notify them of the case disposal, rather than intentional non-compliance. Additionally, the court stayed execution of the impugned judgment and arbitral award during appeal pendency, subject to NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with accrued interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case