PREM CHAND SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/18/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010824582025

Filing Number

CRMPM/12329/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRMPM/18/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREM CHAND SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Prantap Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.ASHWANI KUMAR(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.SURENDER MOHAN(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.SHUBH KARAN(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.SHAMMI KUMAR JAIN(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    The court granted Prem Chand Sharma's application for condonation of 25 days' delay in filing his appeal, finding the delay was unintentional and caused by circumstances beyond his control. The appeal was admitted and registered, with post-admission notices to be issued to respondents; the lower court's record was called for to proceed with substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Prem Chand Sharma's application for condonation of 25 days' delay in filing his appeal, finding the delay was unintentional and caused by circumstances beyond his control. The appeal was admitted and registered, with post-admission notices to be issued to respondents; the lower court's record was called for to proceed with substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case