BANTA RAM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs SANT PAL SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Animesh Pathak — CMPMO/104/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010820532025
Filing Number
CMPMO/69744/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Registration No
CMPMO/104/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANTA RAM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sunny Modgil,Annanya Verma,Annanya Verma, ,Annanya Verma
-
2.Harnail Singh(Not Applicable)
-
3.Devinder Kumar(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANT PAL SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Animesh Pathak
-
2.Usha Devi(Not Applicable)
-
3.Kamal Devi(Not Applicable)
-
4.Yashpal(Not Applicable)
-
5.Jagdish Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
6.Tripta Devi(Not Applicable)
-
7.Ram Piari(Not Applicable)
-
8.Krishna Devi(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Admission After Notice ( Dormant Case )
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Summary: In CMPMO No. 104 of 2026, the case was adjourned to May 6, 2026. Notices served on respondents 5 and 8 were received back but they failed to appear; notices to respondents 2, 4, 6, and 7 were unserved due to incorrect addresses. The court directed petitioners to file correct addresses and particulars within seven days for fresh service. The interim order was continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMPMO/104/2026
Summary: In CMPMO No. 104 of 2026, the case was adjourned to May 6, 2026. Notices served on respondents 5 and 8 were received back but they failed to appear; notices to respondents 2, 4, 6, and 7 were unserved due to incorrect addresses. The court directed petitioners to file correct addresses and particulars within seven days for fresh service. The interim order was continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts