Vijay Kumar Sood(Not Applicable) vs Surender Lal Sood (since deceased) through his LRs Smt.Mamta Gupta and others(Legal Heir)(Not Applicable) Advocate - Abhishek Banta 1. — RSA/108/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010813722025

Filing Number

RSA/69154/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

RSA/108/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Kumar Sood(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Deepak Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Surender Lal Sood (since deceased) through his LRs Smt.Mamta Gupta and others(Legal Heir)(Not Applicable) Advocate - Abhishek Banta 1.

  2. 2.Mamta Gupta W/o Sh.Suresh Gupta,(Not Applicable)1.

  3. 3.Monika Sood Wife of Sh.Shalash Sood,(Not Applicable)1.

  4. 4.Minakshi Sood Wife of Raman Kumar,(Not Applicable)1.

  5. 5.Vishal Sood S/o Late Sh.Surender Lal Sood,(Not Applicable)1.

  6. 6.Swati Sood D/o Late Sh.Surender Lal Sood,(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Raj Kumari W/o late Sh. Surender Lal Sood(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary of RSA No.108 of 2026: The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law regarding: (1) whether lower courts' findings were perverse due to misreading inadmissible evidence; (2) whether subsequent land demarcation violated H.P. Land Records Manual provisions; and (3) whether mandatory injunction can be granted to a plaintiff lacking title/possession at suit institution. The court ordered status quo to be maintained regarding the suit property's nature, possession, and alienation during appeal pendency, and directed records to be sent with case listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RSA No.108 of 2026: The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law regarding: (1) whether lower courts' findings were perverse due to misreading inadmissible evidence; (2) whether subsequent land demarcation violated H.P. Land Records Manual provisions; and (3) whether mandatory injunction can be granted to a plaintiff lacking title/possession at suit institution. The court ordered status quo to be maintained regarding the suit property's nature, possession, and alienation during appeal pendency, and directed records to be sent with case listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case