CHANDER SHEKHAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/1484/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010813272025

Filing Number

CWP/69113/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/1484/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER SHEKHAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Abhinav Purohit,Saurabh Ahluwalia,Saurabh Ahluwalia, ,Ankita,Saurabh Ahluwalia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Tara Chand Chauhan,AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of School Education(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Office Of The Accountant General (A and E)(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by applying the precedent set in CWP No. 9321 of 2025 (Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P.), finding the petitioner's issue squarely covered by that earlier judgment. The court directed that the same directions passed in the Vijay Parmar case shall apply mutatis mutandis to this petition, subject to the State's right to challenge the judgment in appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1484/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by applying the precedent set in CWP No. 9321 of 2025 (Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P.), finding the petitioner's issue squarely covered by that earlier judgment. The court directed that the same directions passed in the Vijay Parmar case shall apply mutatis mutandis to this petition, subject to the State's right to challenge the judgment in appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case