ASHWANI KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/20410/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010812822025

Filing Number

CWP/69071/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/20410/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWANI KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Kumar Thakur,Raman Sharma,Raman Sharma, ,Raman Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed Ashwani Kumar's transfer order from GSSS Pansai to GSSS Loh Tikri, finding that transferring him to a hard area without considering his previous hard area service violated transfer policy. The court directed that the petitioner remain at his current posting and can only be transferred to non-tribal/non-hard areas as defined in the state's transfer policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/20410/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed Ashwani Kumar's transfer order from GSSS Pansai to GSSS Loh Tikri, finding that transferring him to a hard area without considering his previous hard area service violated transfer policy. The court directed that the petitioner remain at his current posting and can only be transferred to non-tribal/non-hard areas as defined in the state's transfer policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case