RITIKA BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable) vs ANAN SOOD(Not Applicable) Advocate - Atharv Sharma — CMPMO/774/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010803792025

Filing Number

CMPMO/68291/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMPMO/774/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITIKA BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Amit Singh Chandel,Abhinav Mehta,Abhinav Mehta, ,Abhinav Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAN SOOD(Not Applicable) Advocate - Atharv Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted Ritika Bhardwaj's petition to transfer her divorce case from Kangra Family Court to Bilaspur Family Court. The court held that the wife's convenience is paramount in matrimonial matters and she cannot be forced to travel 150 kilometers to contest proceedings, especially as her uncontroverted claims of mental cruelty and harassment remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMPMO/774/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted Ritika Bhardwaj's petition to transfer her divorce case from Kangra Family Court to Bilaspur Family Court. The court held that the wife's convenience is paramount in matrimonial matters and she cannot be forced to travel 150 kilometers to contest proceedings, especially as her uncontroverted claims of mental cruelty and harassment remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case