KULVIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/197/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010787852025
Filing Number
CRMMO/11896/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
CRMMO/197/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULVIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sanjeev Kumar
-
2.Surinder Singh(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sanjeev Kumar
-
3.Narinder Kaur(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sanjeev Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Manisha(Not Applicable)
Adv. Hitesh Bali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed FIR No. 2/2021 under IPC Sections 498-A, 504, 506, and 34 (dowry harassment and abusive conduct) based on a compromise between the parties. The court found that since the complainant obtained a mutual divorce and expressly stated she no longer wished to prosecute, and conviction chances were remote, continuing proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose. The court applied Supreme Court precedents permitting quashing of non-heinous, personal-nature offences arising from matrimonial disputes when parties have settled amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/197/2026
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed FIR No. 2/2021 under IPC Sections 498-A, 504, 506, and 34 (dowry harassment and abusive conduct) based on a compromise between the parties. The court found that since the complainant obtained a mutual divorce and expressly stated she no longer wished to prosecute, and conviction chances were remote, continuing proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose. The court applied Supreme Court precedents permitting quashing of non-heinous, personal-nature offences arising from matrimonial disputes when parties have settled amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts