LEKH RAJ(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/1233/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010787292025
Filing Number
CWP/66818/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
CWP/1233/2026
Registration Date
14-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEKH RAJ(Not Applicable)
Adv. Surinder Kumar Saklani
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Rajesh Prakash Om Prakash,AG,AG 1123
-
2.Director Panchayati Raj(Not Applicable)
-
3.Additional Director Panchayati Raj(Not Applicable)
-
4.Block Development Officer Bangana District Una(Not Applicable)
-
5.5. Chief Executive Officer (Jila Parishad)(Not Applicable)
-
6.Mahender Singh(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted the completed inquiry report dated 02.04.2026 regarding the petitioner's complaints that had not been concluded despite prior office letters. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek appropriate legal remedies for any surviving grievances in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/1233/2026
Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted the completed inquiry report dated 02.04.2026 regarding the petitioner's complaints that had not been concluded despite prior office letters. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek appropriate legal remedies for any surviving grievances in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts