SARUP CHAND(Not Applicable) vs THE CSKHPKVV AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/20299/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: HPHC010786692025

Filing Number

CWP/66759/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/20299/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARUP CHAND(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Radhey Shyam Gautam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CSKHPKVV AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Prince Chauhan,AG 1123

  2. 2.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: Sarup Chand v. CSKHPKVV Palampur & Anr. (CWP No.20299/2025) In this civil writ petition hearing on 23.03.2026, the respondent-University failed to file a reply despite being granted opportunity. The petitioner's counsel argued the matter is covered by precedent judgment in CWP No.10878 of 2025. The respondent's counsel was directed to obtain positive instructions. The case was adjourned and listed for 30.03.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Admission After Notice

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/20299/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sarup Chand v. CSKHPKVV Palampur & Anr. (CWP No.20299/2025) In this civil writ petition hearing on 23.03.2026, the respondent-University failed to file a reply despite being granted opportunity. The petitioner's counsel argued the matter is covered by precedent judgment in CWP No.10878 of 2025. The respondent's counsel was directed to obtain positive instructions. The case was adjourned and listed for 30.03.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case