PRABHI DEVI(Not Applicable) vs ANJU SHARMA(Not Applicable) — COPC/1473/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section A215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010786262025
Filing Number
COPC/66719/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
COPC/1473/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHI DEVI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Gupta,Abhendra Gupta,Abhendra Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANJU SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The Himachal Pradesh High Court closed contempt proceedings against Er. Anju Sharma after the Executive Engineer of HPPWD Division No. II, Mandi placed office instructions and a consideration order on record dated 11.03.2026. The court discharged the notice to the respondent and allowed the petitioner liberty to seek appropriate remedies for remaining grievances, while waiving previously imposed costs since the consideration order was passed before the cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/1473/2025
The Himachal Pradesh High Court closed contempt proceedings against Er. Anju Sharma after the Executive Engineer of HPPWD Division No. II, Mandi placed office instructions and a consideration order on record dated 11.03.2026. The court discharged the notice to the respondent and allowed the petitioner liberty to seek appropriate remedies for remaining grievances, while waiving previously imposed costs since the consideration order was passed before the cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts