PANKAJ KAUNDAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/21186/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd January 2026.
CNR: HPHC010783422025
Filing Number
CWP/66482/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
CWP/21186/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
02-Jan-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PANKAJ KAUNDAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Roop Lal Chaudhary,H.R.Sidhu,H.R.Sidhu, ,H.R.Sidhu
-
2.Rekha Kumari(Not Applicable)
-
3.Pankaj Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
4.Surender Kumar Thakur(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director of School Education,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP 21186/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of HP and the Director of School Education to consider and decide the petitioners' representation dated 28.10.2025 within six weeks, in accordance with law and the precedent established in Inder Singh Thakur v. State of HP. The petitioners' grievance was that their representation seeking applicability of the Inder Singh Thakur judgment had not been decided, and the court granted relief without examining merits, with the respondents accepting the petition's prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jan-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/21186/2025
Case Summary: CWP 21186/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by directing the State of HP and the Director of School Education to consider and decide the petitioners' representation dated 28.10.2025 within six weeks, in accordance with law and the precedent established in Inder Singh Thakur v. State of HP. The petitioners' grievance was that their representation seeking applicability of the Inder Singh Thakur judgment had not been decided, and the court granted relief without examining merits, with the respondents accepting the petition's prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts