HARI RAM(Not Applicable) vs HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P/9/2026
Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16(1). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010783032025
Filing Number
EX.P/66446/2025
Filing Date
12-12-2025
Registration No
EX.P/9/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARI RAM(Not Applicable)
Adv. Yudhvir Singh Thakur,Oshin Anand Chauhan,Oshin Anand Chauhan, ,Oshin Anand Chauhan
Respondent(s)
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Godawari 1123
Director South HP State forest Development Corporation Ltd(Not Applicable)
Divisional Manager(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 08-05-2026 | ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: Hari Ram v. HP State Forest Development Corporation Ltd (2026:HHC:15692) The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted Hari Ram's execution petition and ordered refund of Rs. 3,75,725/- that was furnished via demand draft to the Registrar General. The petitioner's counsel undertook to provide bank account details for processing the refund. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to file further proceedings if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Hari Ram v. HP State Forest Development Corporation Ltd (2026:HHC:15692) The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted Hari Ram's execution petition and ordered refund of Rs. 3,75,725/- that was furnished via demand draft to the Registrar General. The petitioner's counsel undertook to provide bank account details for processing the refund. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to file further proceedings if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts