GOVERNMENT OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG vs Prem Dass AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Bhupinder Singh Ahuja — CMP.M/2225/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010770892025

Filing Number

CMP.M/65399/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP.M/2225/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prem Dass AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Bhupinder Singh Ahuja

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Status Summary: In CMP.M-2225 of 2025, the court proceeded ex parte against respondents 1, 2(i)-2(iii), and 3-6 as they failed to appear despite valid service of notice. Respondent 2(iv) could not be served as they deceased nine months prior, and respondent 7's notice was returned unserved due to incorrect father's name. The court directed fresh service attempts for respondent 7 and consequential steps regarding respondent 2(iv)'s death within three weeks, with case relisting thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Dec-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/2225/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: In CMP.M-2225 of 2025, the court proceeded ex parte against respondents 1, 2(i)-2(iii), and 3-6 as they failed to appear despite valid service of notice. Respondent 2(iv) could not be served as they deceased nine months prior, and respondent 7's notice was returned unserved due to incorrect father's name. The court directed fresh service attempts for respondent 7 and consequential steps regarding respondent 2(iv)'s death within three weeks, with case relisting thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case