VIKRAM SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CMP/31560/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010764932025

Filing Number

CMP/64894/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP/31560/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arvind Negi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The court disposed of the execution petition, finding that the State of Himachal Pradesh has complied with the previous judgment by granting the petitioner higher pay benefits effective from 01.04.2024 after completion of two years of service post-regularization. However, the court directed that if financial benefits are not released within eight weeks, the petitioner may revive the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/31560/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the execution petition, finding that the State of Himachal Pradesh has complied with the previous judgment by granting the petitioner higher pay benefits effective from 01.04.2024 after completion of two years of service post-regularization. However, the court directed that if financial benefits are not released within eight weeks, the petitioner may revive the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case