NHAI(Not Applicable) vs LEKH RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Anirudh Sharma, ,Girija Sharma — OMPM/47/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED. on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010762692025

Filing Number

OMPM/64702/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

OMPM/47/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NHAI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sumeet Raj Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEKH RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Anirudh Sharma, ,Girija Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    The court granted NHAI's application to condone the delay in filing its main appeal against an order dated 3.7.2024. NHAI explained that although it received the certified copy on 8.1.2025, the document was inadvertently misplaced and could only be retrieved after due diligence, causing unavoidable delay beyond its control. The respondent raised no objection, and the court found the delay neither intentional nor deliberate, thus condoning it and ordering the appeal be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. OMPM/47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted NHAI's application to condone the delay in filing its main appeal against an order dated 3.7.2024. NHAI explained that although it received the certified copy on 8.1.2025, the document was inadvertently misplaced and could only be retrieved after due diligence, causing unavoidable delay beyond its control. The respondent raised no objection, and the court found the delay neither intentional nor deliberate, thus condoning it and ordering the appeal be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case