NHAI(Not Applicable) vs BALDEV SINGH AND ORS(Not Applicable) — OMPM/29/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED. on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010762652025
Filing Number
OMPM/64698/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
OMPM/29/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NHAI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sumeet Raj Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALDEV SINGH AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
The court granted NHAI's application to condone the delay in filing its main appeal against Baldev Singh. NHAI had received the certified copy of the impugned order dated 1.8.2024 on 29.8.2024 but inadvertently misplaced it, causing delay in appeal filing. The court found the delay was unintentional and due to circumstances beyond NHAI's control, and the respondent did not object. Consequently, the delay was condoned and the appeal was registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
-
23-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. OMPM/29/2026
The court granted NHAI's application to condone the delay in filing its main appeal against Baldev Singh. NHAI had received the certified copy of the impugned order dated 1.8.2024 on 29.8.2024 but inadvertently misplaced it, causing delay in appeal filing. The court found the delay was unintentional and due to circumstances beyond NHAI's control, and the respondent did not object. Consequently, the delay was condoned and the appeal was registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts