NHAI(Not Applicable) vs INDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) — ARB.A/182/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010752342025
Filing Number
ARB.A/63819/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
ARB.A/182/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NHAI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sumeet Raj Sharma,Ritu Sharma,Ritu Sharma, ,Ritu Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed NHAI's appeal challenging a District Judge's order that rejected NHAI's Section 34 application to set aside an arbitrator's award as barred by limitation. The court held that Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 imposes a strict three-month deadline (extendable by 30 days only for sufficient cause), which cannot be further extended under Section 5 of the Limitation Act; NHAI's application filed over four months after the award was received fell beyond this non-condonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARB.A/182/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed NHAI's appeal challenging a District Judge's order that rejected NHAI's Section 34 application to set aside an arbitrator's award as barred by limitation. The court held that Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 imposes a strict three-month deadline (extendable by 30 days only for sufficient cause), which cannot be further extended under Section 5 of the Limitation Act; NHAI's application filed over four months after the award was received fell beyond this non-condonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts