THE HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURSIM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD through its MD(Not Applicable) vs TULSI RAM(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/2283/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010750512025

Filing Number

CMP.M/63659/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP.M/2283/2025

Registration Date

16-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURSIM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD through its MD(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Shivank Singh Panta

  2. 2.Assistant General Manager HPTDC(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Senior Accounts Officer HPTDC(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TULSI RAM(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Summary: The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.'s application seeking condonation of 691 days' delay in filing a review petition was adjourned for four weeks. The court found no "sufficient cause" for the delay, noting gross negligence and bureaucratic indifference, as the corporation applied for a certified copy of the judgment only 681 days after it was delivered. The matter was listed for reconsideration to determine whether the applicant wishes to continue pursuing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/2283/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.'s application seeking condonation of 691 days' delay in filing a review petition was adjourned for four weeks. The court found no "sufficient cause" for the delay, noting gross negligence and bureaucratic indifference, as the corporation applied for a certified copy of the judgment only 681 days after it was delivered. The matter was listed for reconsideration to determine whether the applicant wishes to continue pursuing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case