GAGAN JAIN(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/19622/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010750012025

Filing Number

CWP/63609/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

CWP/19622/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAGAN JAIN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajesh Kumar Parmar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Gaurav Kochhar,AG 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    In CWP No.19622/2025, the case of Dr. Gagan Jain vs. State of H.P. & Others was adjourned for three weeks on May 20, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment citing unavailability of the original counsel, and the court directed the petitioner to file any rejoinder within the three-week period. Additionally, CMP No.11619/2026 was disposed of with directions to file English translations of annexures within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19622/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No.19622/2025, the case of Dr. Gagan Jain vs. State of H.P. & Others was adjourned for three weeks on May 20, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment citing unavailability of the original counsel, and the court directed the petitioner to file any rejoinder within the three-week period. Additionally, CMP No.11619/2026 was disposed of with directions to file English translations of annexures within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case