SANT RAM(Not Applicable) NAVEEN KUMAR BHARDWAJ vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER(Not Applicable) — CMP/9776/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 (1). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010747072025

Filing Number

CMP/63359/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP/9776/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 (1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT RAM(Not Applicable) NAVEEN KUMAR BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Sanjay Jaswal 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP No. 9776/2026 In this application filed on 08.05.2026, the applicants-respondents informed the court that respondent No. 4 (Sher Singh) had died on 05.04.2019. The court disposed of this application accordingly. Additionally, counsel for petitioner Sant Ram informed the court that the petitioner had also expired and requested adjournment to bring the legal representatives (LRs) of both the deceased petitioner and respondent No. 4 on record. The court granted the adjournment as prayed and directed that needful be done within four weeks, with the case listed for hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/9776/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No. 9776/2026 In this application filed on 08.05.2026, the applicants-respondents informed the court that respondent No. 4 (Sher Singh) had died on 05.04.2019. The court disposed of this application accordingly. Additionally, counsel for petitioner Sant Ram informed the court that the petitioner had also expired and requested adjournment to bring the legal representatives (LRs) of both the deceased petitioner and respondent No. 4 on record. The court granted the adjournment as prayed and directed that needful be done within four weeks, with the case listed for hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case