HEMANT SINGH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/1192/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010742772025
Filing Number
CRMMO/11272/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
CRMMO/1192/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEMANT SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rahul Gautam,Sative Chauhan,Sative Chauhan, ,Satpal Chauhan,Sative Chauhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Sanjay Kumar(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ankit Kaloti
-
3.Manoj Kumar(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ankit Kaloti
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Case Adjourned In Hemant Singh vs. State of H.P. (Cr.MMO No. 1192 of 2025), the case was called repeatedly on 25.03.2026 with no representation for the petitioner or respondent No.2. The court adjourned the matter for four weeks in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Presence Of Parties
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
10-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/1192/2025
Case Adjourned In Hemant Singh vs. State of H.P. (Cr.MMO No. 1192 of 2025), the case was called repeatedly on 25.03.2026 with no representation for the petitioner or respondent No.2. The court adjourned the matter for four weeks in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts