BASANT KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/19006/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010737662025

Filing Number

CWP/62531/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/19006/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASANT KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Tek Ram Sharma 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition of Shri Basant Kumar and directed that his pension be authorized and all pension arrears be paid within three months, with regular pension payments to continue thereafter. The court closed the proceedings based on the respondent's counsel's confirmation that pension authorization had been granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  4. 24-Dec-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19006/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition of Shri Basant Kumar and directed that his pension be authorized and all pension arrears be paid within three months, with regular pension payments to continue thereafter. The court closed the proceedings based on the respondent's counsel's confirmation that pension authorization had been granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case