UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable) vs CHETAN PRAKASH AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sudhir Bhatnagar, ,Suresh Singh Saini,Sonia Saini,Pankaj Choudhri — FAO(MV)/78/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010733642025

Filing Number

FAO/62177/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

FAO(MV)/78/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Jagdish Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHETAN PRAKASH AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sudhir Bhatnagar, ,Suresh Singh Saini,Sonia Saini,Pankaj Choudhri

  2. 2.Kumari Tejasvi(Minor)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Sh. Rakesh Kumar(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Summary: FAO(MV)-78/2026 In this First Appeal on Motor Vehicles matter between United India Insurance Company Limited and Chetan Prakash and others, the court hearing on 16.06.2026 addressed procedural requirements regarding Powers of Attorney (POA). The court adjourned the case, directing the Registry to trace and place on record the POA filed for respondent No. 3, while granting a two-week extension for submission of POA on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. The case is listed for further hearing after the extended period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO(MV)/78/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO(MV)-78/2026 In this First Appeal on Motor Vehicles matter between United India Insurance Company Limited and Chetan Prakash and others, the court hearing on 16.06.2026 addressed procedural requirements regarding Powers of Attorney (POA). The court adjourned the case, directing the Registry to trace and place on record the POA filed for respondent No. 3, while granting a two-week extension for submission of POA on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. The case is listed for further hearing after the extended period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case