BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD(Not Applicable) AMAN SOOD vs GULAB DEVI(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/948/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O22R4. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010732332025

Filing Number

CMP.M/62054/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMP.M/948/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O22R4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD(Not Applicable) AMAN SOOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULAB DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Raman Sethi 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The court allowed applications CMP(M) No. 948 & 949/2026 to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent Daleep Singh Gopen (who died on 08.09.2020) on record in the ongoing First Appeal, and condoned the delay in filing these applications. The court found the delay was unintentional and beyond the applicant's control, as she was an uneducated village woman unaware of legal procedures. The legal representatives were accordingly ordered to be added as parties, except those already on record as respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/948/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed applications CMP(M) No. 948 & 949/2026 to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent Daleep Singh Gopen (who died on 08.09.2020) on record in the ongoing First Appeal, and condoned the delay in filing these applications. The court found the delay was unintentional and beyond the applicant's control, as she was an uneducated village woman unaware of legal procedures. The legal representatives were accordingly ordered to be added as parties, except those already on record as respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case