ARVIND VERMA(Not Applicable) vs DHIAN SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pawan Sharma, ,Pawan Sharma — CRMMO/1129/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010720342025

Filing Number

CRMMO/10998/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRMMO/1129/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND VERMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ravinder Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHIAN SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pawan Sharma, ,Pawan Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary of CRMMO No. 1129/2025 (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Arvind Verma sought to quash a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, arguing his Rs. 10 lakh cheque was returned due to a frozen bank account, not insufficient funds. The High Court dismissed his petition, holding that while it can quash complaints to prevent abuse, the authenticity of the return memo claiming account freezing must be proven at trial with cogent evidence, not merely assumed from a single document. The court reasoned that the actual reason for cheque dishonor—insufficient funds versus account freezing—is a factual issue requiring full trial evidence, not preliminary determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  9. 22-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  10. 22-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/1129/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMMO No. 1129/2025 (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Arvind Verma sought to quash a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, arguing his Rs. 10 lakh cheque was returned due to a frozen bank account, not insufficient funds. The High Court dismissed his petition, holding that while it can quash complaints to prevent abuse, the authenticity of the return memo claiming account freezing must be proven at trial with cogent evidence, not merely assumed from a single document. The court reasoned that the actual reason for cheque dishonor—insufficient funds versus account freezing—is a factual issue requiring full trial evidence, not preliminary determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case