NHAI(Not Applicable) vs HIMANSHU RAM (since deceased) through LRs AND ANR(Not Applicable) Advocate - Hitesh Bali — OMPM/507/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED. on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010715252025
Filing Number
OMPM/60567/2025
Filing Date
19-Nov-2025
Registration No
OMPM/507/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NHAI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sumeet Raj Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIMANSHU RAM (since deceased) through LRs AND ANR(Not Applicable) Advocate - Hitesh Bali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
The court condoned NHAI's delay in filing its appeal against a judgment dated 7.3.2025, accepting that the delay resulted from inadvertent loss of the certified copy rather than willful neglect. The court registered the appeal and granted a stay on execution of both the impugned judgment and arbitral award, conditioned on NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
28-Feb-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
02-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
19-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. OMPM/507/2025
The court condoned NHAI's delay in filing its appeal against a judgment dated 7.3.2025, accepting that the delay resulted from inadvertent loss of the certified copy rather than willful neglect. The court registered the appeal and granted a stay on execution of both the impugned judgment and arbitral award, conditioned on NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts