SUNIL KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs NEELAM KUMARI(Not Applicable) — Cr.Rev.(FC)/77/2025
Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(4). Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010711422025
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
Filing Number
Cr.Rev.(FC)/10867/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
Cr.Rev.(FC)/77/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Naresh Kumar Tomar
Respondent(s)
NEELAM KUMARI(Not Applicable)
Kumari Palak Panwar (Minor)(Not Applicable)
Master Mayank Panwar (Minor)(Not Applicable)
Kumari Priyanka Panwar (Minor)(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
OFFICE OBJECTION
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
OFFICE OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-12-2025 | OFFICE OBJECTION |
| 21-05-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 23-03-2026 | OFFICE OBJECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.Rev.(FC) No.77/2025 In Sunil Kumar versus Neelam Kumari & Others, the court adjourned the criminal revision petition to 21.05.2026 for consideration. The court accepted the power of attorney filed by respondents' counsel and directed that Mr. Varun Thakur's name be reflected in future cause-lists. In the related application (Cr.MP No.5247/2025), the court directed the respondents' reply to be placed on record and ordered a rejoinder within three weeks, clarifying that the petition filing does not constitute a stay on any execution petition by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.Rev.(FC) No.77/2025 In Sunil Kumar versus Neelam Kumari & Others, the court adjourned the criminal revision petition to 21.05.2026 for consideration. The court accepted the power of attorney filed by respondents' counsel and directed that Mr. Varun Thakur's name be reflected in future cause-lists. In the related application (Cr.MP No.5247/2025), the court directed the respondents' reply to be placed on record and ordered a rejoinder within three weeks, clarifying that the petition filing does not constitute a stay on any execution petition by respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts