VINOD KUMAR AND ANR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/21267/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: HPHC010703012025

Filing Number

CWP/59499/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/21267/2025

Registration Date

31-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR AND ANR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Yudhvir Singh Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Chander Shekhar Thakur,Chander Shekhar Thakur,AG 1123

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary - CWP No. 21267/2025 In Vinod Kumar and another versus State of H.P and others, the court (Judge Jyotsna Rewal Dua) adjourned the case to 24.04.2026. Respondent No.2's reply was found lying under objection in the registry; counsel was directed to follow up for its proper filing. All parties ordered to file remaining pleadings (reply/rejoinder) within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/21267/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - CWP No. 21267/2025 In Vinod Kumar and another versus State of H.P and others, the court (Judge Jyotsna Rewal Dua) adjourned the case to 24.04.2026. Respondent No.2's reply was found lying under objection in the registry; counsel was directed to follow up for its proper filing. All parties ordered to file remaining pleadings (reply/rejoinder) within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case