MANAV BHARTI UNIVERSITY(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/2836/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010700682024

Filing Number

CWP/57895/2024

Filing Date

27-Dec-2024

Registration No

CWP/2836/2025

Registration Date

28-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAV BHARTI UNIVERSITY(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Parav Sharma,Rahul Thakur,Rahul Thakur, ,Parmod Kumar Chauhan,Shekhar Badola,Vishali Lakhanpal,Rahul Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Lal Singh Mehta,AG,Vishwajeet Singh 1123

  2. 2.Himachal Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: The case (CWP No.2836 of 2025) involving Manav Bharti University's petition to allow admissions to different courses has been adjourned. The court directed Respondent No.1 (State of H.P.) to file a reply within three weeks, and the matter has been listed for further hearing thereafter. No interim orders were passed on the merits of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 27-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 13-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  7. 03-Apr-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  8. 27-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2836/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case (CWP No.2836 of 2025) involving Manav Bharti University's petition to allow admissions to different courses has been adjourned. The court directed Respondent No.1 (State of H.P.) to file a reply within three weeks, and the matter has been listed for further hearing thereafter. No interim orders were passed on the merits of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case