M/S HOLLY HOCK EXPORTS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/16793/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010699942024

Filing Number

CWP/57842/2024

Filing Date

27-Dec-2024

Registration No

CWP/16793/2024

Registration Date

31-Dec-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S HOLLY HOCK EXPORTS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Anil Chauhan,Nitin Thakur,Nitin Thakur, ,Nitin Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The General Manager(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No.16793/2024 In the main petition (CWP 16793/2024), the court adjourned the case and directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter. In the related application (CMP 26433/2024), the court made absolute the interim order dated 01.01.2025 after confirming that the petitioner complied by depositing the required extension fee. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 01-Jan-2025

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 27-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16793/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No.16793/2024 In the main petition (CWP 16793/2024), the court adjourned the case and directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within three weeks, with the matter to be listed thereafter. In the related application (CMP 26433/2024), the court made absolute the interim order dated 01.01.2025 after confirming that the petitioner complied by depositing the required extension fee. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case