HARISH ARORA(Not Applicable) vs ALKA KAPAHI AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CS/50/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as withdrawn on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010691092025

Filing Number

CS/58470/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

CS/50/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as withdrawn

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISH ARORA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Anubhuti Sharma,Sahil Malhotra,Sahil Malhotra, ,Sahil Malhotra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALKA KAPAHI AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Abhinav Kainthla,Abhinav Kainthla,NEMO 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    Case Summary (CS/50/2025): The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the suit filed by Harish Arora against Alka Kapahi and others on 23.3.2026, allowing the plaintiff's withdrawal based on a compromise deed executed between the parties. The defendants did not dispute the compromise terms, and the court ordered refund of court fee to the plaintiff as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Additional Registrar(j)

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS/50/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (CS/50/2025): The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the suit filed by Harish Arora against Alka Kapahi and others on 23.3.2026, allowing the plaintiff's withdrawal based on a compromise deed executed between the parties. The defendants did not dispute the compromise terms, and the court ordered refund of court fee to the plaintiff as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case