Union of India and Anr(Not Applicable) Deputy Solicitor General of India vs Ms Garg Garg Co(Not Applicable) Advocate - Srishti Chauhan, ,Pratiksha Chandel — CARBC/27/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010690672025
e-Filing Number
06-11-2025
Filing Number
ARB.C/58432/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
CARBC/27/2026
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Union of India and Anr(Not Applicable) Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.Chief Engineer(Not Applicable)
Adv. Balram Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ms Garg Garg Co(Not Applicable) Advocate - Srishti Chauhan, ,Pratiksha Chandel
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CARBC No.27 of 2026 In this arbitration-related petition between Union of India and Ms. Garg & Garg Company, the court granted the petitioner's counsel four weeks' time to file a rejoinder after the respondent's reply was filed. Additionally, in related application CARAP No.35 of 2026, the court allowed the applicant/petitioner two days' extension to deposit the award amount as per the order dated 14.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
31-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
31-Dec-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
27-Nov-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CARBC/27/2026
Case Summary: CARBC No.27 of 2026 In this arbitration-related petition between Union of India and Ms. Garg & Garg Company, the court granted the petitioner's counsel four weeks' time to file a rejoinder after the respondent's reply was filed. Additionally, in related application CARAP No.35 of 2026, the court allowed the applicant/petitioner two days' extension to deposit the award amount as per the order dated 14.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts