DEEPAK KUMAR PUGGAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3337/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010688222025

Filing Number

CWP/58213/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

CWP/3337/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR PUGGAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Navneet Kumar Bhalla,Chehak Khurana,Chehak Khurana, ,Chehak Khurana

  2. 2.Davinder Puggal(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. DSGI,Raman Ravi Verma,AG 1123

  2. 2.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.District Collector Solan(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Real Estate Regulatory Authority(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Deepak Virmani(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Datta Ram(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by referencing its earlier judgment in *Pawan Wasant Borle v. Union of India*, finding that the petitioners' grievance regarding mandating execution of RERA orders had already been adjudicated. The court directed the District Collector, Solan, to ensure that recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to RERA orders and recovery certificates are expeditiously concluded in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by referencing its earlier judgment in *Pawan Wasant Borle v. Union of India*, finding that the petitioners' grievance regarding mandating execution of RERA orders had already been adjudicated. The court directed the District Collector, Solan, to ensure that recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to RERA orders and recovery certificates are expeditiously concluded in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case