L AND T HIMACHAL HYDRO POWER LTD(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CMP/27641/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 53. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010687222025

Filing Number

CMP/58122/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMP/27641/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 53

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T HIMACHAL HYDRO POWER LTD(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Gaurav Gautam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Gagan Anand,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Summary of CMP No. 27641/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's applications seeking to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The State filed these applications over seven years after submitting its first statement in the writ petition, well beyond the statutory deadline. The court held that once a party willingly participates in litigation and subjects itself to court jurisdiction without timely invoking arbitration, it waives its right to later demand arbitration referral. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Pronouncement Of Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/27641/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CMP No. 27641/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's applications seeking to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The State filed these applications over seven years after submitting its first statement in the writ petition, well beyond the statutory deadline. The court held that once a party willingly participates in litigation and subjects itself to court jurisdiction without timely invoking arbitration, it waives its right to later demand arbitration referral. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case