L AND T HIMACHAL HYDRO POWER LTD(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CMP/27640/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 53. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010687202025
Filing Number
CMP/58120/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
CMP/27640/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.L AND T HIMACHAL HYDRO POWER LTD(Not Applicable)
Adv. Gaurav Gautam
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Gagan Anand,AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed L&T Himachal Hydro Power Ltd's state applications seeking referral to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the applications barred by delay. The court ruled that since the state filed its reply on 22.09.2018 (first statement on substance of dispute) but filed the arbitration referral application only on 10.11.2025—over seven years later—it had waived its right to arbitration, which must be invoked not later than submission of the first statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Pronouncement Of Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMP/27640/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed L&T Himachal Hydro Power Ltd's state applications seeking referral to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the applications barred by delay. The court ruled that since the state filed its reply on 22.09.2018 (first statement on substance of dispute) but filed the arbitration referral application only on 10.11.2025—over seven years later—it had waived its right to arbitration, which must be invoked not later than submission of the first statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts